<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SB2041</title>
	<atom:link href="http://velociped.kempiweb.net/ntvc/2009/07/sb2041/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://velociped.kempiweb.net/ntvc/2009/07/sb2041/</link>
	<description>News and information for the vehicular cyclist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:42:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipSeal</title>
		<link>http://velociped.kempiweb.net/ntvc/2009/07/sb2041/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipSeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://velociped.kempiweb.net/ntvc/?p=306#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I must agree with your conclusion. I wish lobbyists would insist on good bills, rather than settling for any old bill at all, as if they will be judged on quantity rather than quality.

Isn&#039;t that handbook misleading? How can it list &quot;the most common&quot; motorist caused collisions and not even mention overtaking collisions? (sarcasm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I must agree with your conclusion. I wish lobbyists would insist on good bills, rather than settling for any old bill at all, as if they will be judged on quantity rather than quality.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that handbook misleading? How can it list &#8220;the most common&#8221; motorist caused collisions and not even mention overtaking collisions? (sarcasm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

